Monetary reform refers to proposals to change a country's monetary system, including how money is created, regulated, and distributed. Such reforms seek to address perceived problems with current monetary schemes, like financial instability, wealth inequality, or inflation. Monetary reform movements grow during economic crises, proposing alternatives to prevailing systems.
Reforms range widely from a return to commodity-backed currencies like the gold standard to more radical changes like full reserve banking or government-issued debt-free money. Some reforms seek technical adjustments to existing systems, while others propose to fundamentally restructure money's economic functions.
Monetary system evolution's major transitions included from the gold standard to the Bretton Woods system to current fiat money. Each transition has generated debate about the optimal monetary arrangement for economic stability and growth.
Proponents' arguments include that currencies backed by gold had more stability than fiat money. They argue required gold reserves limited financing expenditures through money creation. Austrian school economists have advocated returning to gold-backed currencies to prevent inflation.
Critics' arguments center on monetary policy constraints during economic downturns. Mainstream economists note the gold standard may have prolonged the Great Depression by preventing money supply expansion to fight deflation. Countries that abandoned the gold standard earlier in the Great Depression recovered more quickly.
Theoretical foundation: The Chicago plan, designed by University of Chicago economists, spurred academic attention. The plan would separate monetary and credit functions, transferring money creation to government control.
Proponents' arguments include the elimination of Bank run, as banks would have reserves to meet all withdrawals. They argue it would reduce systemic risk and provide governments greater control over the money supply.
Critics' arguments focus on potential economic disruption and reduced credit access. They suggest full reserve banking could drive borrowers to the shadow banking system. Mainstream economists express concern about reduced capital allocation efficiency, as well as transition costs and potential unintended consequences.
Theoretical basis: Proponents argue money creation should be a public function rather than a private one. They propose that government created money could be spent into circulation for public purposes instead of private bank profit.
Policy examples: Switzerland held the 2018 Swiss sovereign-money initiative, which did not pass. Iceland considered a similar proposal following the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis. These real-world applications provide insight into political and implementation challenges.
Economic analysis: Supporters argue sovereign money could provide better control over they money supply and reduce debt burden. Critics claim asset bubbles may still be possible. The Swiss National Bank opposed the initiative claiming lack of expertise and resources.
The Social Credit Party of Canada gained power in Alberta in 1935, governing for decades.
Related proposals advocate for the government issuing interest-free money for infrastructure. Proponents seek to prevent inflation by withdrawing the credit from circulation as the loan is repaid. Historical examples of government-issued interest-free money include American Revolution continentals and American Civil War greenbacks.
Historical examples include the Wära in Germany. It had led to modest economic prosperity before it was forbidden by the finance ministry.
Despite their success, most demurrage currencies were banned by central banks for violating national monopolies on currency. Contemporary versions include complementary currency and negative interest rate proposals.
The inflation surge reignited debates about:
Procyclical bank lending expands credit during booms, contributing to asset bubbles, followed by a drop in credit during busts, amplifying economic downturns. The money supply is created by bank lending, and central banks have limited ability to stop booms with higher capital requirements.
This suggests constant economic growth is necessary, with unsustainable resource consumption and environmental degradation. Labor-saving technologies are generally used to increase income and consumption not reduce hours of work.
Critics claim the privilege to create currency and charge interest enable banks to thrive at everyone else's expense. Wright Patman objected to governments paying interest for money created "out of nothing", making economic activity dependent on private bank self-interest.
The finance sector would be weakened because its profit is reduced. Critics claim a sovereign money system would stimulate shadow banking and alternative means of payment. Alt URL See also and
In the traditional banking system, the central bank controls the interest rate while the money supply is determined by the market. In a sovereign money system, the central bank controls the money supply while the market controls the interest rate. In the traditional system, the need for investments determines the amount of credit that is issued. In a sovereign money system, the amount of saving determines the investments. This change of influences will generate a new and different system with its own dynamics and possible instabilities. The interest rate may fluctuate as well as the Market liquidity. It is not certain that the market will find an equilibrium where the liquidity is sufficient for the needs of the real economy and full employment.
Critics doubt whether the central bank's tools for money supply are sufficient. The central bank may have to provide credit to commercial banks and accept the accompanying risk.
They worry about restrictions on economic freedom.
Developing countries' external debt can harm local culture and the environment. Countries have experimented with alternative monetary rules, often related to external debt and balance of payments. These experiences can provide case studies for understanding monetary reform.
Countries such as Ecuador and Zimbabwe used currency substitution, while others have used Currency board with loss of flexibility.
The Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union was a significant innovation in international monetary reform, demonstrating the possibilities and challenges in economic policy coordination across member states.
134 countries with 98% of world GDP are evaluating a national digital currency. The Bahamas, Jamaica, and ENaira have launched CBDCs. CBDCs could provide government-issued digital currency directly to the public.
The design choices for CBDCs vary significantly, including decisions about privacy, programmability, offline functionality, and intermediation models. These choices have profound implications for monetary policy effectiveness, financial stability, and individual privacy.
|
|